By PAULENE POPARAD
Porter Plan Commission members agreed Wednesday that any new business
structure exceeding 3,500 square feet in a Business-2 zone first should have
to obtain special approval because a larger size wouldn’t be compatible with
nearby residences.
That’s just one of the recommendations forwarded to the Town Council for
final action as part of several proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance.
Included are tougher requirements regarding the number and total square
footage of signs in all business and industrial districts.
Initially the draft amendment prepared by town planner Jim Mandon said
grocery stores in a B-2 zoning district couldn’t exceed 5,000 square feet
without a special exception. But commission members Ken Timm and Brenda
Brueckheimer suggested dropping the size to 3,500 square feet.
Member Greg Stinson went further suggesting the smaller size be applied to
all business uses in B-2. “If something (larger) comes up and it makes sense,
take it to the (Board of Zoning Appeals) and we can look at it.” Timm agreed
that going before the BZA would give neighbors a chance to be heard.
The Town Council could change the B-2 size limit when it considers the
amendments. Mandon said if they’re adopted, any existing B-2 building over
3,500 square feet would become a legal, non-conforming use and require BZA
permission to be expanded.
The proposed amendments also would move several types of stores, the trend
for each being larger structures like a freestanding Walgreen’s instead of a
small corner drug store, from the Business-1 zone to B-2. Mandon said B-1 is
Porter’s downtown; B-2 is closer to major streets and away from homes.
The stores affected are drug stores or convenience pharmacy, dry cleaning and
retail laundry receiving stations, convenience stores, office supply stores,
paint and wallpaper stores, shoe stores and sporting goods stores.
Another change is banning drive-thru windows for restaurants in B-2 unless
they receive a BZA variance; drive-thrus would be allowed in Business-3,
which is located near major highways.
Additional amendments clarify language regarding front lot line, a public
street and a street after a lawsuit over the right to build in Porter Beach
called into question access off a private street.
Other changes deal with when the Plan Commission can initiate a rezoning if
the property involved is being developed as a planned unit development or
PUD.
If approved by the Town Council, also under the new rules the total number of
signs would be limited to two, including those on a building and
freestanding; their combined size generally could not exceed 100 square feet.
The exception would be if the BZA approves more/larger signs, or under a
formula based on a business structure’s distance from the road.
Following a brief public hearing all amendments were forwarded on a 5-0 vote
with members Paul Childress and Lorain Bell absent.
Mandon told the commission it’s unclear if previously recommended zoning
amendments were forwarded to the Town Council and ever acted upon earlier
this year. These dealt with development on non-conforming lots of record.
Mandon offered to investigate and said an ongoing codification of town
ordinances will help avoid such misunderstandings.
In other business, by unanimous vote the commission gave final approval to
developer Larry Gough, who did not attend, for an addendum to the text of his
PUD ordinance for Mineral Springs Villas on Beam Street at Mineral Springs
Road. Originally approved as one-story, paired-patio homes, earlier this year
the commission OK’d allowing bonus rooms in an upper level with the same roof
line.
Since then Gough also asked to change six of the duplexes to single-family
homes. Last night’s PUD amendment states single-family structures of 1
1/2-story configuration are acceptable, however, town attorney Patrick Lyp
said Gough still can build duplexes if he wants on the six lots.
Commission member Jim Eriksson said he preferred the single-family homes
because they’d leave more room between buildings and generate fewer cars per
building.
Lyp advised and the commission agreed the PUD change is a minor one not
requiring the involvement of the Town Council, which approved the original
Mineral Springs Villas PUD.
Posted 5/17/2007