The Chesterton
Board of Zoning Appeals has approved six variances enabling the owner of the
old carriage house at 108 S. 13th St. to remodel the building.
Members voted
unanimously at their meeting Thursday night to grant Mary Cahillane’s
petition.
The property in
question--zoned B-2--is actually comprised of five separate lots with three
structures: a commercial structure immediately south of Broadway, a
single-family residence further south fronting South 13th Street,
and--adjacent to and west of the single-family--a carriage house.
At issue: the home
itself was built in 1910, the commercial structure not long after that, and
the carriage house in 1948--all prior to the Town of Chesterton’s adoption
in the Fifties of a comprehensive zoning ordinance.
Which means that
the property is legally nonconforming in several ways, so that in order now
to secure a building permit for renovations of the carriage house Cahillane
needed the following variances:
--A variance to
permit a second principal structure on a lot.
--A variance to
permit remodeling of the carriage house in a B-2 zone with a lot area of
7,062.5 square feet, 137.5 square feet under the minimum 7,200 square feet
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
--A variance to
permit remodeling a residential unit in a B-2 zone with a width of 56’ 6’’,
13’ 6’’ under the minimum 70-foot width.
--A variance to
permit remodeling a residential unit in a B-2 zone with a front-yard setback
of 22’ 10’’, 7’ 2’’ less than the minimum 30 feet.
--A variance to
permit remodeling a residential unit in a B-2 zone with a rearyard setback
of four inches, 9’ 8’’ less than the minimum 10 feet.
--And a variance to
improve an existing commercial building in a B-2 zone with a front-yard
setback of 20’ 6’’, 9’ 6’’ less than the minimum of 10 feet.
In fact the
petition was a no-brainer for the BZA. “I’m always happy to see someone in
the community invest resources in repairing an existing piece of property,”
Member Joe Ackerman said. “There are obviously peculiarities involved in the
age and history of the property.”
“I think
improvement of the building is a good thing,” Member Joel Carney concurred.
“It will be good for the neighborhood.”
“Anytime we can
improve the visual effect of a building it’s a good thing,” President
Richard Riley added.
“This basically is
a corrective measure,” Member Jim Kowalski said.
At a public hearing
which preceded the vote, no one spoke in favor of the petition and no one in
opposition.