By KEVIN NEVERS
Over the objection of many property owners in the neighborhood, at least one
resident, and a Town Council member, Chesterton will permit the Town of
Porter to build—at its own expense—a pair of five-foot sidewalks on either
side of Jackson Blvd. from the railroad grade-crossing all the way south to
the Prairie Duneland Trail.
At its meeting Monday night, the council voted 4-1 to permit Porter to
install those sidewalks as the link between its own Brickyard Trail—whose
southern terminus will be just north of the grade-crossings, at the
intersection of Wagner Road and Lincoln Street—and the Prairie Duneland
Trail. Member Dave Cincoski, R-3rd, voted against the motion.
That vote brings to a more or less amicable resolution an issue which has
divided Chesterton and Porter for some years now.
Originally Porter had sought to build an eight-foot hike-and-bike link on
Jackson Blvd. but property owners and residents objected vociferously because
it would have eliminated some on-street parking. Instead Chesterton wanted to
see the link between the two trails built along the commercial strip of 15th
Street. That option, however, Porter rejected for safety reasons: the three
railroad grade-crossings which cut across 15th Street are widely separated,
while those which cut across North Jackson Blvd. closely converge.
There the issue was left, until the council’s last meeting, when Porter Town
Council member Bill Sexton proposed the pair of five-foot sidewalks, which
will be built entirely within the 66-foot public right-of-way and should not
affect parking at all. Street Commissioner John Schnadenberg, for his part,
expressed the opinion that construction would probably not necessitate the
removal of any trees either.
Sexton estimated the total cost of the project at a minimum of $72,170.21.
Cincoski, however—part of whose district falls on the west side of Jackson
Blvd.—indicated that only one of the 13 property owners to whom he spoke
about the project supported it.
Earlier in the meeting, one of those property owners, Martha Colvin, told the
council that she opposed the proposed eight-foot sidewalk several years ago
and that she remains opposed to a pair of five-footers. “I don’t understand
why they have to go there,” she said.
Several members, on the other hand, couldn’t understand why Colvin wouldn’t
want sidewalks. “I’m a little confused,” said Member Jeff Trout, R-2nd.
“We’ve got an opportunity to put them in at no cost. It makes sense to me. It
seems to me it would improve the owners’ property values to have sidewalks
there.”
Trout noted as well that, under current Town Code, the developers of new
subdivisions are required to build sidewalks, whether they want to or not.
The previous council, remarked Member Sharon Darnell, D-4th, “went through a
lot of guff” forcing people to install them, however much they may have
wanted a waiver from the Town Standard requiring a sidewalk in front of all
new construction.
And Member Jim Ton, R-2nd, observed that there are residents only too happy
to pay 50 percent of the cost of installing a new sidewalk in front of their
homes, under the Street Department’s 50/50 program.
In the end the council gave Porter the green light, with the condition that
it enters into a “hold-harmless” indemnification agreement with Chesterton.
Schnadenberg said that letters would be sent to property owners on Jackson
Blvd. informing them of the project.
Police Chief George Nelson did put a kibosh on one misunderstanding related
to the sidewalks. Under Town Code bicyclists will be permitted to ride on
them, as bicyclists are permitted to ride on all sidewalks in Chesterton not
actually in the business district.
Posted 4/15/2008