Chesterton Tribune            adv:

 

State eyes six lanes for 49 through Chesterton

Back to Front Page

By PAULENE POPARAD

Local cities and towns will have a say on projects proposed in the state’s $31 billion long-range highway improvement plan, an Indiana Department of Transportation official assured Wednesday.

Porter County Highway Engineer David Schelling questioned on what basis INDOT’s plan calls for Indiana 49 between the Indiana Toll Road and Interstate 94 to go from four to six lanes in 2009 at a cost of $14 million.

INDOT planning assistant Don Houterloot told Schelling a computer modeling program identified that area for likely future congestion and being in need of upgrading. “If you do not concur with (the modeled projects,) they’ll probably be taken out of the plan,” said Houterloot, adding that less-extensive improvements could be made in an area to address congestion.

After the meeting, Houterloot said the same local input would be solicited by INDOT for a proposed $7.4 million new interchange at Indiana 49 and Indian Boundary Road in Chesterton to be built in 2007. The town would be consulted and involved during design hearings. Chesterton officials support the Indian Boundary interchange.

State transportation officials are proposing more than $1.4 billion in highway improvements in northwest Indiana alone through 2025, but that was before Indiana’s revenue forecasts took a nose dive.

Wednesday’s hearing took place at the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission, which must approve area INDOT projects for programming and federal funding. NIRPC transportation planner Steve Strains cited the possibility of those federal dollars decreasing rather than increasing in 2003-2012.

“You’re right,” said Roy Nunnally, INDOT development specialist. “It might be the state doesn’t have enough to do expansion projects; we might just have enough for preservation projects, like repaving.”

Strains also said there are some significant differences between NIRPC’s identified long-range transportation projects and those proposed by INDOT and he suggested the two agencies meet to discuss them.

Houterloot said that a proposed northwest Indiana south suburban/Illiana Expressway is included in the state’s long-range plan although a route isn’t identified at this time due to uncertainty over its potential alignment. The rural expressway is seen as an alternative to the overcrowded Borman Expressway.

Houterloot said INDOT’s philosophy is to do a project right the first time so the same section of highway doesn’t have to be torn up two and three times. “So INDOT’s going to overbuild now?” asked NIRPC staffer Belinda Petrosky.

Houterloot said no. INDOT will implement changes and improvements to facilitate traffic flow, he explained, but when it comes to a major road project, “We attempt not to visit the area several times.”

Wednesday’s hearing was one of 12 statewide to present the 2025 plan, on which public comment ends late this month. Revisions will be made and revenue forecasts updated before a final draft is prepared. Final adoption is eyed early next year.

The plan, detailed maps and project listings can be viewed at INDOT’s website:

 www.IN.gov/dot/publications/longrange

 Rail/bus transit and aviation components will be added in the future.

The plan was based on forecasted socio-economic growth showing over the 2000-2025 period, statewide population is projected to increase 17 percent, and statewide employment to increase 30 percent. Travel demand is estimated to increase much more rapidly at 62 percent.

A full-needs scenario identified 1,074 miles of added travel lanes as needed to decrease traffic congestion and keep highway system performance (as measured by operating speeds) stable.

The no-build scenario increased congestion from 4 percent of highway mileage in 2000 to 25 percent in 2025. Urban-interstate speed also would decrease by 25 percent, and overall system performance would decrease 10 percent from 53 mph in 2000 to 48 mph in 2025.

Nunnally stressed that the plan now under review is a draft. “That means everything can change. Nothing is concrete.”

 

Posted 11/8/2001