Chesterton Tribune


Visclosky talks budget and gun control at forum

Back to Front Page





U.S. Rep. Pete Visclosky, D-1st, is warning folks who’ve been breathing a sigh of relief—following Congress’ passage on Jan. 1 of a compromise bill meant to keep the country from stepping over the so-called “fiscal cliff”—that there’s more “theater” just around the corner.

At his annual Duneland town hall forum last week, Visclosky said that, at the end of February, Congress will address the debt ceiling. Nor is sequestration off the table. “I just caution you, people will be looking for cuts” in what Visclosky deliberately called entitlement programs.

“I want to make sure I’m very clear,” he explained with reference to Medicare and Social Security. “There’s a lot of semantics involved here. These are federal programs people have paid a tax on and they’re entitled to a benefit. And we need to make sure these programs stay solvent for current and future beneficiaries.”

These programs, Visclosky added, “are not part of the budget deficit. I don’t want them to become part of the budget deficit.” And as matters stand, Medicare is solvent through 2024 and Social Security through 2033. The problem is the natural inertial tendency of Congress to postpone action until the last possible moment. “Why wait until the last possible moment before solving it? Do something now. We ought to have that discussion now.”

In any case, Visclosky said, he was one of 16 Democrats to vote against the Jan. 1 compromise bill precisely because it leaves these programs vulnerable.

Gun Control

On the other topic of moment at the town hall forum—gun control—Visclosky was mostly noncommittal. “With the tragedies that have occurred, legislation will be considered. But it’s hard to speculate what form it will take in the House.”

Visclosky did say that, in 1994, he voted in favor of the Brady Bill, which mandated background checks on gun purchasers and eventually evolved into an automated check system.

He also voted in favor of a ban on the sale and distribution of assault weapons and limited magazine capacity to 10 rounds. That bill was in effect for 10 years, was never challenged before the U.S. Supreme Court, but expired and was never re-authorized.


Visclosky opened the forum, as he always does, with an overview of his positions on a variety of issues.

On the War in Afghanistan: President Obama has committed troops through the end of 2014—to reduce the insurgency, strengthen the government, and improve its economy, as his stated goals—but Visclosky believes that “the time has past gone to withdraw troops.”

On unemployment: the number of folks unemployed now—11.3 million, compared to the 13 million when President Obama was sworn into office—remains “unacceptable,” Visclosky said.

On trade: “We must attack the trade deficit and protect ourselves against illegal trade practices,” Visclosky said. He added that he is “angry” both with Congress and with President Obama “for not going after China for money manipulation.”

On commerce: “Stop rewarding companies with grants and tax benefits who outsource,” Visclosky said.



Posted 1/16/2013