Chesterton Tribune

Analysis: Library brings community residents benefits at low cost

Back to Front Page
 

 

 
 

 

 

By KEVIN NEVERS 

If the basic point of the Indiana Commission on Local Government Reform (CLGR) is to reduce property owners’ tax bills—through the consolidation, for instance, of smaller township library systems with larger county ones—then the question naturally arises: how much are property owners actually paying to support the Westchester Public Library (WPL), and how significant a burden is that amount? 

Consider. 

The WPL’s pay-2008 rate was $0.1218 per $100 of assessed valuation. On paper the owner of a Chesterton home assessed at $150,000—and, to simplify matters, on which no credits or exemptions have been filed—paid $182.70 last year to the WPL (150,000 divided by 100 multiplied by 0.1218). 

Compare. 

That same homeowner paid $849.45 to the Town of Chesterton (rate $0.5663) and a total of $3,861.90 to all taxing units (rate $2.5746, when the state, county, airport, township, library, school, and municipal are combined). 

In other words, the WPL took only 4.7 percent of that homeowner's total bill. 

Now $182.70 is still $182.70. So let’s put that amount into even sharper context. For $182.70 you could annually rent 42 new release DVDs from Blockbuster or not quite one per week (at $4.39 each) or 92 non-new release videos or not quite two per week (at $1.99 each). 

Or you could simply visit the WPL and borrow your DVDs and videos at no charge, up to four at a time, from its collection of 15,467 titles (in 2006). 

My family borrows around four children's features a week from the WPL, figure 200 a year: Arthur, The Magic School Bus, that sort of thing. Were we to rent those from Blockbuster at 99 cents each, we would pay at least $206 annually. 

Perhaps you're a reader who’d be tempted to purchase a hardcover book—at $20, let's say—had not the WPL already added it to its collection of 141,514 titles. Perhaps you're an avid reader who'd be tempted to purchase one hardcover book per month. Every year the WPL saves you $240. 

Or maybe you’re like me. Every now and then—once a month, for the sake of argument—I get an itch to hear a particular song 20 or 30 times before getting sick of it forever. I could buy the whole CD, at $13 let’s say, play the song obsessively for a week or two, then never listen to it again. But I don’t. I just borrow the CD from the WPL’s collection of 10,335 titles. Every year, by that reckoning, the WPL saves me $156. 

In short, card holders enjoyed an enormous savings last year on rental fees and purchase prices, concealed somewhere in the WPL's total lendings of 159,157 books, 147,927 CD and videos, and 32,852 CDs. 

How great a savings? 

The Indiana State Library has calculated that every $1 spent on public libraries in the state yields direct benefits with a market value of $2.38, including access not only to adult and children’s holdings but also to reference assistance, meeting rooms, computer use, adult and children’s programs, and magazines and newspapers. So when a Westchester Township family remitted its $182.70 WPL levy for 2008, it actually made a payment on goods and services with a market value of at least $434.26, much more of course if that family is a heavy user of the WPL. 

Very seldom do we have an opportunity to determine, with anything like certainty, what it would cost us to provide for ourselves a service currently provided by government. For many Westchester Township property owners, I suspect, the library tax is an out-and-out bargain. For others, it’s a perfectly acceptable supplement to their annual entertainment budget. 

Now the CLGR is recommending the consolidation of smaller libraries with county ones, not the liquidation of them. Once local control is lost of the smaller libraries, however, it may amount to nearly the same thing. The county library boards of trustees, struggling to fund the services and programs of their new acquisitions on top of those of their existing facilities, might be tempted to let the consolidated branches languish, to slash their budgets, cut their personnel, reduce their hours of operation, shrink their holdings. Bottom line: in Westchester Township property owners would still be paying a library tax rate—the Porter County one—yet could well find their entertainment choices at the old WPL increasingly limited and their out-of-pocket entertainment expenses proportionately higher. 

Or—in the alternative—a county library board of trustees trying to make ends meet could conceivably file an excess levy appeal with the Indiana Department of Local Government Finance. In this case whatever benefit might have been gained from the elimination of the WPL tax rate would be largely negated by the increase of the Porter County Library tax rate. 

Put it this way. If the CLGR wants to make a credible recommendation in favor of consolidation, it must demonstrate two things: first, that the tax burden imposed by the WPL on property owners truly is onerous; second, that consolidation truly would relieve that burden without in any way sacrificing the entertainment choices currently available to card holders at the WPL.

 

Posted 1/15/2009