By RICK CALLAHAN
Associated Press Writer
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Opponents of Gov. Mitch Daniels’ proposed tollway bypass
of Indianapolis harshly criticized the project Tuesday, urging members of a
Senate committee not to rush to endorse legislation that would grant the
governor authority to pursue it and another tollway.
State highway officials, elected officials and other supporters testified
before the Senate’s transportation committee first, telling the panel the
proposed Indiana Commerce Connector around Indianapolis and Illiana
Expressway in northwestern Indiana would relieve congestion and fuel
economic growth.
Opponents of the bill, however, said the promises by the Indiana Department
of Transportation were premature and that it was uncertain how much economic
growth the proposed privately built and operated tollways would generate.
And they said it’s unclear whether the new tollways would significantly
reduce traffic on some of the state’s congested highways.
“Governor Daniels and INDOT are trying to sell the public, hardworking
Hoosiers, a bottle of fake Viagra,” said Pat Andrews of Camby. “They want
you to get all excited about what you think you’re buying but they don’t
want you to look too close to find out what you’re actually buying.”
The bill’s key provision would be transferring to the two proposed highways
the tolling authority that the General Assembly granted Daniels last year
for part of the planned Interstate 69 extension linking Indianapolis and
Evansville.
Committee chairman Sen. Tom Wyss, the bill’s sponsor, said he had expected
the legislation to go to a vote Tuesday. But Wyss, R-Fort Wayne, decided on
a delay after hearing from other legislators who had questions and who are
considering amendments.
The vote has now been delayed at least one week.
“I want everybody to know what we’re talking about and all the nuances to
it,” Wyss said.
When he announced the Indiana Commerce Connector in November, Daniels said
the state could collect about $1 billion by allowing a private entity to pay
to build and operate it as a tollway that would loop 75 miles east and south
of Indianapolis.
He said that money would help the state pay for the I-69 extension and allow
its entire route to be a free of tolls. He later proposed the Illiana
Expressway that would run from I-94 near Michigan City south of Valparaiso
and Gary to I-57 south of Chicago.
INDOT commissioner Karl Browning told the panel the legislation is “a bold
initiative that is right on the money” for dealing with congestion in
central and northwestern Indiana.
He was followed by a parade of business and government officials who offered
support for the bill, including Dennis Malloy, executive director of the
Hancock County Economic Development Council. He said the Commerce Connector
that would cut through the county immediately east of Indianapolis would
create new jobs and expand the county’s tax base.
“The competition for new development is fierce and it is global. This
highway would be a valuable asset for us,” Malloy said.
But residents who live in the areas where the proposed tollways would pass
joined with environmentalists and activists who oppose the I-69 in
criticizing the legislation.
Several said lawmakers were moving too quickly in considering additional
privately operated tollways after passing legislation last year that leased
the Indiana Toll Road to a private consortium for 75 years at a cost of $3.8
billion.
“The rush to privatization is like driving too fast on a foggy morning. We
risk collision if we go too fast,” said Tom Tokarski, president of the
anti-I-69 group Citizens for Appropriate Rural Roads.
Rob Schafstall of Franklin said that approval of the tollways was being
considered long before any analyses of the economic impacts, routes and
other questions about them had been studied.
“You are making a critical decision at the beginning of the process,” he
said. “There are no studies done. All we know are hunches.”
Tim Maloney, the executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council,
said the state needs to explore the idea of commuter trains to alleviate
highway congestion — not just “new and bigger roads.” He urged lawmakers to
move slowly on the tolling proposal.
“Let’s not abandon the legislative oversight on this,” Maloney said.
Posted 1/24/2007