|
|
|
||
|
Note: The following is an unedited press release posted for information purposes:
Save the Dunes Council Position on SB 1 as of 3/5/2007 The Save the Dunes Council’s Board of Directors has adopted a position opposing Senate Bill 1 (SB 1). Not opposing SB 1 implies that we consent that the Illiana Toll Road should be built, which is a proposition our board members could not live with, especially considering that the proposed route does enter the Lake Michigan Watershed. Specifically, Save the Dunes Council is unable to support SB 1 for several reasons: It is Save the Dunes Council’s position that the proposed Illiana Toll Road legislation places far too much control over the project in the hands of the Governor and diminishes necessary oversight and input from the legislature. This is especially important considering how long the State will be leasing the land to the private company. When problems occur or defaults happen, the public will ultimately pay. More safeguards, such as legislative oversight over contracts and agreements, should be amended to the legislation. Furthermore, the role and authority of the Legislative Review Committee needs to be more clearly defined. Otherwise, the legislation's stated oversight is merely illusory and could mislead the public. As with other privatization initiatives in the State of Indiana, little has been done to actually determine the need and/or feasibility for this project. If this legislation cannot be stopped, it should be changed to allow for a Feasibility Study only that includes adequate opportunities for public input. Furthermore, this study must include typical by-pass feasibility assessment tools such as origin/destination surveys and a travel time/delay study. Placement of the proposed toll road will cause irreparable harm to the environment by destroying vital natural ecosystems, and by encouraging and accelerating unchecked development in areas not governed by effective land-use planning. Instead, Save the Dunes recommends legislative and policy initiatives that support smart growth and open space, lessens our reliance on the automobile; and promotes revitalization and investment in core, existing communities. We are also concerned about how the road and its associated unchecked development will impact certain areas of the Lake Michigan Watershed and a large portion of the ground water in the Kankakee River Watershed in Indiana. We want to make sure this impact is assessed by the Study Committee, and that all significant natural features and resources are documented before a route is selected. In addition, it is our belief that the “environmental impacts” referenced in Section 11(4)C of the legislation need to be more accurately defined, such as: Using the current INDOT Procedural Manual for Environmental Studies also requires INDOT to assess the societal and environmental justice impacts of the project. Save the Dunes Council believes that the attractiveness of cheap land and labor in the proposed areas will potentially pull investment from the inner core cities awaiting brownfield re-development and economic re-vitalization. Save the Dunes also believes that it is time for fresh, new solutions to transportation as well as smart growth including: In conclusion, this legislation is seriously flawed and vague and either needs to be re-written to address these concerns or not passed by the Legislature.
* The Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program (CREATE) is a first-of-its-kind partnership between the State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Metra and the nation's freight railroads. A project of national significance, CREATE will invest $1.5 billion in critically needed rail infrastructure improvements. (http://www.createprogram.org/faq.htm#whatis) |
|||
|
|||
|
|||