TRAVERSE CITY,
Mich. (AP) — Closing shipping locks in Chicago waterways to prevent Asian
carp from invading the Great Lakes would cost the area economy about $4.7
billion over two decades, according to an analysis released Wednesday.
That report from
the Illinois Chamber of Commerce envisions a far greater economic ripple
than a February study commissioned by the state of Michigan, which is
leading a legal campaign to close the locks temporarily while a long-term
solution to the Asian carp threat is devised.
The new “study
shows, through well-reasoned economics, that closing these locks will have a
devastating effect on our local economy, resulting in the loss of
potentially hundreds of area jobs and hurting a range of industries and
services,” said Jim Farrell, executive director of the Illinois chamber’s
Infrastructure Council.
Bighead and
silver carp, both Asian natives, have infested Chicago-area rivers and
canals that link Lake Michigan with the Illinois River and ultimately the
Mississippi River. Biologists say the plankton-gobbling invaders, which eat
up to 40 percent of their body weight daily, could enter the Great Lakes
through the locks and disrupt the food chain, starving out valued species
such as salmon and walleye.
The U.S. Supreme
Court twice has rejected Michigan’s request to order the locks closed.
In their
February report, transportation specialist John Taylor of Wayne State
University in Detroit and James Roach, a consultant, said Illinois was
overstating the economic damage closing the locks could cause.
They estimated
it would boost the costs of transporting and hauling cargo by about $70
million annually — a fraction of Chicago’s $521 billion economy.
That figure
would remain constant as long as shipping traffic continued at current
levels, Roach said — suggesting a total of about $1.4 billion over 20 years.
The Illinois
chamber last week released reviews by three economists that criticized the
methods and conclusions in the Michigan report, which the chamber described
as “irresponsible and inaccurate.”
Joseph
Schwieterman of DePaul University, the author of the Illinois report, said
in a phone interview that his analysis was not intended to refute Taylor and
Roach, but to take a broader look at potential economic hardships from
closing the locks.
In addition to
shipping cost increases, which he calculated at $89 million, Schwieterman
said shifting cargo to trucks would cost $27.5 million a year in highway
wear and tear.
He projected
losses of $5.1 million for marinas and other boating facilities and $19.6
million for tour and cruise companies.
“The tourism
role is a small part of the overall potential damage but it’s a large and
vibrant industry at risk,” he said.
Stormwater and
flood management would be the most expensive result of lock closure, he
said. If the locks no longer could be used to regulate river levels and send
excess flow into Lake Michigan, a $1.8 billion underground tunnel would have
to be constructed.
Schwieterman
estimated losses at $582 million the first year after lock closure, $531
annually over the next seven years, and $155 million annually thereafter.
Over 20 years, he said, the total would reach $4.7 billion.
Taylor said
Wednesday his study focused only on shipping costs at the request of
Michigan officials who commissioned it. On that topic, his and
Schwieterman’s findings were not far apart, he said.
“This is not
going to be an exact science,” Taylor said.
Farrell said
Michigan had used the Taylor-Roach study and DNA evidence of Asian carp’s
presence beyond an electronic barrier in the Chicago waterways to stir
unjustified fears of an imminent invasion.
“We want to be
positive contributors to solving this problem, but we want to do it without
harming the economy,” he said.
John Sellek,
spokesman for Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox, said the Illinois study
exaggerated potential economic damages, but “even if you accepted their
study, their 20-year loss pales in comparison to the $7 billion the Great
Lakes fishing industry generates every year.”